The detail discovered after Gene Hackman's death that would prove that the actor wanted his children out of the will

The recent ing of Hollywood legend Gene Hackman has unveiled unexpected details about his estate planning, particularly concerning the inheritance of his three children: Christopher, 65, Elizabeth, 62, and Leslie, 58. Despite their acknowledgment in his will, Hackman's decision to list all properties solely under his wife Betsy Arakawa's name has sparked speculation about his intentions regarding his children's inheritance.

Hackman and Arakawa amassed a substantial real estate portfolio, including a $3.8 million Santa Fe compound, a $6 million commercial property in Honolulu, and a $1 million plot in New Mexico.

Notably, all these assets were ed exclusively in Arakawa's name, despite Hackman's estimated net worth of $80 million.

Implications for Hackman's Children

This arrangement has led insiders to suggest that Hackman intended for Arakawa to be the primary beneficiary, potentially excluding his children from direct inheritance of these properties. An insider noted: "Perhaps he didn't want his children to inherit them and he wanted Betsy to be comfortable for the rest of her life. He loved her dearly, so it's understandable."

Complicating matters further, Betsy Arakawa's will reportedly on her estate to charity, as she had no children of her own. Given that Arakawa predeceased Hackman, legal experts suggest that his children may have grounds to claim portions of the estate under New Mexico's community property laws.

As the sole surviving heirs, they could argue for entitlement to Hackman's share of the assets.

The unfolding situation highlights the complexities that can arise in writing wills, especially when significant assets and blended family dynamics are involved. As legal proceedings progress, the true intentions behind Hackman's estate allocations may become clearer, potentially setting precedents for similar cases in the future.